Get the latest perspectives on Microsoft Dynamics ERP software selection process from industry experts.

Your ERP Has the Data. So Why Is Finance Still in Excel?

Visit Website View Our Posts
Turning Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Data into Smarter Financial Decisions

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are essential to managing financial transactions, maintaining accurate records, and providing visibility into business performance. But as organizations grow, finance teams often discover that having the data they need is not the same as having the tools to make better decisions.

For many businesses using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Excel remains a central part of budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and financial analysis. While spreadsheets can be useful, relying on them for increasingly complex financial processes can introduce disconnected data, version-control challenges, manual work, and uncertainty about which numbers leadership should trust.

So, if your ERP already contains the financial data your organization needs, why is finance still spending so much time in Excel?

In a conversation exploring ERP modernization, financial planning, and artificial intelligence (AI), Dominick Zappia, Partner at Admiral Consulting Group, sits down with Gurpreet Chaggar, Product Marketing Manager at Prophix, to discuss why growing finance teams often outgrow ERP-only financial processes and how connected corporate performance management (CPM) and financial planning and analysis (FP&A) solutions can help.

The central message is clear: Your ERP should be the foundation of your financial data, not necessarily the limit of your financial intelligence.


Understanding the Difference Between ERP and Financial Planning

ERP systems are designed primarily to capture transactions, maintain financial records, and provide a reliable view of what has already happened. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central helps organizations manage core business operations and financial information in a centralized environment.

However, understanding historical performance is only one part of the finance function. CFOs and finance leaders must also evaluate what might happen next, understand the impact of changing assumptions, allocate resources, and provide leadership with timely insights.

This is where CPM and FP&A capabilities become increasingly important.

Rather than asking an ERP to handle every financial process, organizations can complement Business Central with a dedicated planning and performance management solution such as Prophix. This approach separates the system responsible for recording transactions from the tools used to analyze performance, build forecasts, model scenarios, and support strategic decisions.

For growing organizations, this distinction can be especially valuable. Instead of trying to force every planning process into an existing ERP or relying on spreadsheets to fill the gaps, finance teams can build an architecture that supports both accurate financial records and forward-looking analysis.


When Excel Becomes a Warning Sign

Excel remains a valuable tool for finance professionals. The challenge arises when spreadsheets become the primary infrastructure for critical financial processes.

As businesses expand, budgeting and forecasting become more complicated. Finance teams may need to consolidate information from multiple departments, reconcile different versions of a file, update assumptions manually, and combine data from several systems before they can produce a report.

These activities consume time that could otherwise be spent analyzing results and advising the business.

They also introduce risks. When different departments maintain separate spreadsheets, it can become difficult to establish a consistent version of the truth. Manual updates and disconnected files can delay reporting and create questions about the accuracy of financial information.

In these circumstances, Excel is not necessarily the problem. It is a signal that the organization's financial processes may have outgrown the architecture supporting them.

A more connected planning environment can help centralize assumptions, standardize reporting, improve collaboration, and give finance leaders greater confidence in the information they use to make decisions.


Why ERP Migration Should Include a Broader Finance Strategy

For organizations considering an ERP migration or modernization project, the conversation should extend beyond replacing existing software.

A new ERP may improve transaction processing, operational visibility, and financial data management. However, migrating to a modern ERP does not automatically eliminate spreadsheet-based planning or address every reporting and forecasting challenge.

That is why finance leaders should consider the broader financial architecture before making technology decisions.

The goal is to determine which capabilities belong in the ERP and which would benefit from a dedicated planning and analysis platform. With Business Central serving as a core system of record and Prophix providing complementary financial planning capabilities, organizations can establish a more connected environment for managing financial performance.

This approach also creates opportunities to bring together information from other business systems, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources information systems (HRIS), and external files.

Instead of simply moving existing processes into a new ERP, organizations can use modernization as an opportunity to rethink how financial data flows throughout the business.


Moving Beyond Basic Budgeting with Scenario Planning

Traditional budgeting and forecasting processes often depend on manually exporting data, updating spreadsheets, and rebuilding calculations whenever business conditions change.

This can make it difficult for finance teams to respond quickly to new questions from leadership.

What happens if revenue growth slows? How would additional hiring affect cash flow? Could the business accommodate a new investment while maintaining its financial targets? What would happen if costs increase or customer demand changes?

These questions require more than a historical report. They require the ability to model different assumptions and compare potential outcomes.

Modern FP&A capabilities allow finance teams to evaluate multiple scenarios, examine the impact of changing variables, and provide decision-makers with a clearer picture of possible outcomes.

By reducing dependence on disconnected spreadsheets, organizations can make scenario planning a more repeatable and collaborative process. Finance teams can spend less time assembling data and more time explaining what the numbers mean.

The result is a shift from simply reporting past performance to helping the business prepare for the future.


Faster Financial Close Creates More Time for Strategic Work

The financial close is another area where manual processes can limit the value finance teams deliver.

When teams must repeatedly collect information, reconcile data, update files, and prepare reports across disconnected systems, the close process can become unnecessarily time-consuming.

During the discussion, Chaggar notes that Prophix customers can potentially reduce their financial close timeline by three to seven days. Actual results will depend on an organization's existing processes, data quality, implementation, and use of the platform.

The broader opportunity extends beyond completing the close sooner.

When finance professionals spend less time manipulating data and coordinating manual tasks, they have more capacity to investigate variances, identify trends, support department leaders, and provide timely business recommendations.

Improving the close process is therefore not just an operational efficiency goal. It can help finance become a more proactive partner in business decision-making.


Why AI in Finance Must Start with Better Data

Artificial intelligence is creating new opportunities to automate financial processes, accelerate analysis, and generate insights. However, organizations should be careful not to assume that adding AI will automatically solve existing data problems.

If financial information is fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly governed, AI tools may simply process that information faster without producing reliable answers.

This is an important consideration for CFOs exploring AI-powered financial planning and reporting.

Before investing in new AI capabilities, finance leaders should ask a foundational question: Is our data ready for AI?

Preparing for AI involves establishing clean, connected, and governed data, improving consistency across source systems, and ensuring that the information used for analysis can be trusted.

A connected CPM environment can help bring financial and operational information together, creating a stronger foundation for analytics and future AI initiatives.

The objective is not simply to introduce more automation. It is to create an environment where technology can help finance teams generate insights that are relevant, explainable, and grounded in reliable business information.


Connecting Business Central with Prophix

For organizations using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, integrating ERP data with a financial planning and performance management platform can help bridge the gap between transaction processing and forward-looking financial analysis.

Prophix can complement Business Central by supporting planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and performance analysis while helping bring information together from multiple source systems.

This broader view of business data can help finance teams move away from isolated spreadsheets and toward more consistent financial processes.

A connected environment can support several important objectives:

  • More consistent reporting: Reduce reliance on manually assembled spreadsheets and disconnected data sources.
  • Improved budgeting and forecasting: Give finance teams a more structured approach to developing plans and updating assumptions.
  • More effective scenario modeling: Evaluate alternative business outcomes and understand the potential impact of decisions.
  • Greater visibility across the organization: Bring together relevant information from ERP, CRM, HRIS, and other systems.
  • A stronger foundation for AI: Improve data consistency and governance before introducing more advanced analytics and automation.

The right implementation approach will depend on an organization's systems, reporting requirements, business processes, and data readiness. Integration and implementation planning should therefore be treated as important parts of the broader finance transformation strategy.


Why Growing Businesses May Not Realize They've Outgrown Their Tools

One of the challenges facing finance leaders is recognizing when their existing processes are no longer sufficient.

Spreadsheets may still produce the required reports. Employees may know how to work around system limitations. Manual processes may have become so familiar that the time and risk they introduce are difficult to see.

Over time, however, these workarounds can become obstacles to growth.

As reporting requirements expand and the business becomes more complex, finance teams may struggle to maintain consistency, respond to new questions, or provide leadership with timely forecasts.

Recognizing these challenges is the first step toward building a more scalable financial environment.

Rather than asking whether the current ERP can do everything, CFOs should evaluate whether their overall finance technology architecture provides the right combination of transaction management, planning, reporting, analytics, and control.


From Managing Data to Making Better Decisions

The value of modern finance technology is not measured solely by the number of processes it automates or reports it produces.

Its real value lies in helping finance teams turn business information into meaningful insight.

When financial data is connected, planning processes are structured, and reporting is more accessible, finance professionals can spend less time gathering numbers and more time interpreting them. They can help leadership understand financial performance, evaluate risks, compare strategic options, and make better-informed decisions.

For organizations using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, this means looking beyond the ERP itself and considering how complementary CPM and FP&A capabilities can support the next stage of growth.

ERP modernization is an opportunity to do more than replace technology. It is an opportunity to rethink how the business plans, forecasts, reports, and makes decisions.


Ready to Get More Intelligence from Business Central?

If your finance team is spending too much time in Excel, struggling with disconnected reports, or finding it difficult to produce reliable forecasts, it may be time to evaluate your broader finance technology strategy.

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central can provide a strong foundation for financial and operational data. Complementary planning and performance management capabilities can help turn that information into deeper insights, more flexible forecasts, and more confident business decisions.

Admiral Consulting Group can help you explore the next step in your finance transformation. Whether you're evaluating an ERP migration, modernizing your existing Business Central environment, or looking for ways to improve financial planning and reporting, the first step is understanding what your finance team needs to accomplish next.

Talk with Admiral Consulting Group about building a connected financial environment that helps your business move beyond spreadsheets and make smarter, data-driven decisions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.